Biblical Types, Symbols & Patterns
Mire
Claim-level biblical evidence review with contextual controls, canonical relationships, and preserved interpretive history.
Biblical Types, Symbols & Patterns
Claim-level biblical evidence review with contextual controls, canonical relationships, and preserved interpretive history.
Evidence grades apply to individual claims, not to the headword as a whole. Strong biblical identification is kept separate from plausible or traditional interpretations, and unsupported proposals remain visible as negative evidence rather than being silently removed.
Second Peter uses a sow returning to mire as a proverbial analogy for return to corrupt conduct after exposure to the way of righteousness.
Context control: The analogy is context-bound to the false-teacher/apostasy warning; mire is not a universal code for all human works.
Scope: The image concerns defiling regression in this proverb; literal mire and other figurative uses retain their own contexts.
Residual uncertainty: No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.
The legacy wording treats mire as a fixed symbol of man’s works and filth.
Context control: Scripture supports contextual filth/defilement or distress imagery, but not a universal equation between mire and human works.
Scope: Retain contextual filth/distress imagery without universalizing it into a works-symbol.
Residual uncertainty: No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.
These are cross-tier mappings only; lexical definitions remain owned by the site’s lexical resources.
This page is part of an AI-assisted conservative evangelical Bible-study project. It has passed structured research, review, and QA gates, but it is not inspired or infallible and does not replace Scripture, prayer, pastors, teachers, or local church discernment.
Claims should be tested against Scripture in context. Corrections and Review Policy.