Biblical Types, Symbols & Patterns
13
Claim-level biblical evidence review with contextual controls, canonical relationships, and preserved interpretive history.
How to read this entry
Evidence grades apply to individual claims, not to the headword as a whole. Strong biblical identification is kept separate from plausible or traditional interpretations, and unsupported proposals remain visible as negative evidence rather than being silently removed.
Genesis 14:4 states that the kings served Chedorlaomer for twelve years and rebelled in the thirteenth year; the number thirteen is therefore part of the historical chronology of t
Genesis 14:4 states that the kings served Chedorlaomer for twelve years and rebelled in the thirteenth year; the number thirteen is therefore part of the historical chronology of that rebellion, not an inspired interpretation of thirteen as “rebellion.”
Context control: The text records when rebellion occurred; it does not assign symbolic meaning to the ordinal number in unrelated contexts.
Genesis 14:4 states that the kings served Chedorlaomer for twelve years and rebelled in the thirteenth year; the number thirteen is therefore part of the historical chronology of that rebellion, not an inspired interpretation of thirteen as “rebellion.”
Grade 1: Explicit biblical interpretationScope: The text records when rebellion occurred; it does not assign symbolic meaning to the ordinal number in unrelated contexts.
Residual uncertainty: No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.
Scripture
Evidence sources
- Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison — Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1
No biblical passage interprets thirteen as a universal symbol of rebellion, backsliding, apostasy, or a double portion; deriving those meanings from isolated numerical coincidences
No biblical passage interprets thirteen as a universal symbol of rebellion, backsliding, apostasy, or a double portion; deriving those meanings from isolated numerical coincidences exceeds the canonical evidence.
Context control: The rejection concerns the proposed invariant number-code; individual passages containing thirteen remain interpretable from their own literary contexts.
No biblical passage interprets thirteen as a universal symbol of rebellion, backsliding, apostasy, or a double portion; deriving those meanings from isolated numerical coincidences exceeds the canonical evidence.
Grade 7: Insufficient biblical evidenceScope: The rejection concerns the proposed invariant number-code; individual passages containing thirteen remain interpretable from their own literary contexts.
Residual uncertainty: No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.
Scripture
Evidence sources
- Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison — Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1
Study-aid notice
This page is part of an AI-assisted conservative evangelical Bible-study project. It has passed structured research, review, and QA gates, but it is not inspired or infallible and does not replace Scripture, prayer, pastors, teachers, or local church discernment.
Claims should be tested against Scripture in context. Corrections and Review Policy.