Potiphar's Wife
Potiphar’s wife is the unnamed Egyptian woman who tried to seduce Joseph in Genesis 39 and then falsely accused him when he refused her advances.
Potiphar’s wife is the unnamed Egyptian woman who tried to seduce Joseph in Genesis 39 and then falsely accused him when he refused her advances.
The unnamed wife of Potiphar, Joseph’s Egyptian master, who sought to entice Joseph into sin and then blamed him when he fled.
Potiphar’s wife is the unnamed wife of Potiphar, Joseph’s master in Egypt, described in Genesis 39. She persistently sought to entice Joseph into sexual sin, but Joseph refused on moral and theological grounds, recognizing the act as a betrayal of his master and a sin against God. When Joseph fled, leaving his garment behind, she used it to support a false accusation that resulted in his imprisonment. Though she is not a major doctrinal term, her role in the narrative serves as a clear biblical example of temptation, false accusation, personal integrity, and God’s providence in working through suffering and injustice.
In the Joseph narrative, Potiphar’s wife functions as the immediate source of Joseph’s trial in Egypt. Her accusation moves the story from household service to imprisonment, where God continues to be with Joseph and advances His purposes.
The narrative reflects the social setting of an elite Egyptian household, where a slave’s word would carry little weight against that of a master’s wife. The account does not depend on detailed historical reconstruction; its theological force rests on the biblical story itself.
Jewish interpretation has long read this episode as a test of Joseph’s righteousness and a warning about sexual sin, false accusation, and the cost of faithful conduct. The text itself, however, keeps the woman unnamed and focuses attention on Joseph’s response and God’s providence.
The Hebrew text does not name her; she is identified only as Potiphar’s wife.
Her role in the narrative underscores the reality of temptation, the seriousness of sexual sin, the cost of righteousness, and God’s ability to accomplish His purposes through unjust suffering.
The episode illustrates moral agency, accountability, and the difference between outward accusation and inward integrity. It also shows that immediate circumstances do not always reflect moral truth, since the innocent may suffer while divine providence remains at work.
Do not speculate beyond the text about her motives or psychology. Do not build doctrine from her anonymity or from silence in the narrative. The point of the passage is Joseph’s faithfulness and God’s providence, not detailed characterization of the woman herself.
Evangelical interpreters broadly agree that she is an unnamed narrative figure in Genesis 39 whose actions serve the story’s theological emphasis on Joseph’s integrity and God’s providence.
This entry should not be used to derive doctrines about marriage, gender, or providence beyond what Genesis 39 explicitly teaches. The text supports moral instruction and narrative theology, not speculative reconstruction.
The account warns believers to flee sexual temptation, to expect that righteousness may be misunderstood, and to trust God when obedience brings unjust consequences. It also cautions against giving false testimony or using power dishonestly.