{
  "entry_id": "TSP-ENT-000572",
  "slug": "wood-shittim",
  "url_path": "/types-symbols/wood-shittim/",
  "canonical_name": "Wood (Shittim)",
  "entry_classifications": [
    "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION",
    "MOTIF"
  ],
  "modules": [
    "TABERNACLE_TEMPLE",
    "COLORS_MATERIALS_STONES",
    "CHRISTOLOGICAL_TYPES"
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "legacy_present": true,
  "legacy_raw_wording_public": false,
  "senses": [
    {
      "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001237",
      "label": "Shittim/acacia wood is a literal material repeatedly specified by God for tabernacle furnishings and structural elements, including the ark, table, frames, and altars; its cultic i…",
      "classification": "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION",
      "definition": "Shittim/acacia wood is a literal material repeatedly specified by God for tabernacle furnishings and structural elements, including the ark, table, frames, and altars; its cultic importance arises from the commanded construction, not from an intrinsic symbolic meaning of the wood itself.",
      "not_always": "Acacia wood functions as actual sanctuary construction material; material symbolism requires separate textual warrant.",
      "scope_note": "The repeated tabernacle use is explicit, but Scripture does not thereby assign the material an independent symbolic referent.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001237",
          "statement": "Shittim/acacia wood is a literal material repeatedly specified by God for tabernacle furnishings and structural elements, including the ark, table, frames, and altars; its cultic importance arises from the commanded construction, not from an intrinsic symbolic meaning of the wood itself.",
          "asserted_classifications": [
            "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION",
            "MOTIF"
          ],
          "type_kinds": [],
          "evidence_grade": 4,
          "grade_basis": "G4_RECURRENT_CANONICAL_MOTIF_OR_STRONG_THEMATIC_PATTERN",
          "status": "REQUIRES_RECLASSIFICATION",
          "public_wording_class": "CATEGORY_OR_RECLASSIFICATION_NOTICE",
          "scope_limitation": "The repeated tabernacle use is explicit, but Scripture does not thereby assign the material an independent symbolic referent.",
          "strongest_alternative_explanation": null,
          "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.",
          "theological_intersections": [
            "OTHER"
          ],
          "scripture_references": [
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001908",
              "osis_start": "Exod.25.10",
              "osis_end": "Exod.25.10",
              "display_label": "Exodus 25:10",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001909",
              "osis_start": "Exod.25.23",
              "osis_end": "Exod.25.23",
              "display_label": "Exodus 25:23",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001910",
              "osis_start": "Exod.26.15",
              "osis_end": "Exod.26.15",
              "display_label": "Exodus 26:15",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001911",
              "osis_start": "Exod.27.1",
              "osis_end": "Exod.27.1",
              "display_label": "Exodus 27:1",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            }
          ],
          "source_citations": [
            {
              "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001",
              "author_editor": null,
              "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison",
              "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1",
              "locator": null,
              "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED",
              "source_function": [
                "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY",
                "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT"
              ],
              "locator_targets": []
            }
          ],
          "s8_wording_provenance": null
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001238",
      "label": "Scripture does not interpret shittim/acacia wood as humanity, Christ, or the saints. The legacy appeal to the root out of dry ground, the stem of Jesse, and Davidic family-tree ima…",
      "classification": "MOTIF",
      "definition": "Scripture does not interpret shittim/acacia wood as humanity, Christ, or the saints. The legacy appeal to the root out of dry ground, the stem of Jesse, and Davidic family-tree imagery draws from separate messianic botanical texts and does not identify those images with the tabernacle’s acacia material.",
      "not_always": "Christological botanical titles and sanctuary materials must remain distinct unless later Scripture explicitly joins them.",
      "scope_note": "A traditional Christological analogy exists elsewhere in the project, but the canonical text does not establish shittim wood = humanity/Christ/saints.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001238",
          "statement": "Scripture does not interpret shittim/acacia wood as humanity, Christ, or the saints. The legacy appeal to the root out of dry ground, the stem of Jesse, and Davidic family-tree imagery draws from separate messianic botanical texts and does not identify those images with the tabernacle’s acacia material.",
          "asserted_classifications": [
            "MOTIF",
            "ANALOGY"
          ],
          "type_kinds": [],
          "evidence_grade": 7,
          "grade_basis": "G7_INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE",
          "status": "INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE",
          "public_wording_class": "INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE",
          "scope_limitation": "A traditional Christological analogy exists elsewhere in the project, but the canonical text does not establish shittim wood = humanity/Christ/saints.",
          "strongest_alternative_explanation": null,
          "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.",
          "theological_intersections": [
            "CHRISTOLOGY"
          ],
          "scripture_references": [
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001908",
              "osis_start": "Exod.25.10",
              "osis_end": "Exod.25.10",
              "display_label": "Exodus 25:10",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001912",
              "osis_start": "Isa.11.1",
              "osis_end": "Isa.11.1",
              "display_label": "Isaiah 11:1",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001913",
              "osis_start": "Isa.53.2",
              "osis_end": "Isa.53.2",
              "display_label": "Isaiah 53:2",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001597",
              "osis_start": "Rev.22.16",
              "osis_end": "Rev.22.16",
              "display_label": "Revelation 22:16",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            }
          ],
          "source_citations": [
            {
              "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001",
              "author_editor": null,
              "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison",
              "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1",
              "locator": null,
              "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED",
              "source_function": [
                "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY",
                "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT"
              ],
              "locator_targets": []
            }
          ],
          "s8_wording_provenance": null
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "lexeme_mappings": [],
  "canonical_relationships": [],
  "negative_guardrails": [
    {
      "guardrail_id": "TSP-S6-R03-P03-GRD-039",
      "canonical_relation_status": "NEGATIVE_GUARDRAIL_INSUFFICIENT",
      "adjudication_outcome": "INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE",
      "decision_statement": "No positive canonical type/symbol relationship is promoted beyond the source evidence: Scripture does not interpret shittim/acacia wood as humanity, Christ, or the saints. The legacy appeal to the root out of dry ground, the stem of Jesse, and Davidic family-tree imagery draws from separate messianic botanical texts and does not identify those images with the tabernacle’s acacia material."
    }
  ]
}