{ "entry_id": "TSP-ENT-000561", "slug": "whore-doms", "url_path": "/types-symbols/whore-doms/", "canonical_name": "Whore(Doms)", "entry_classifications": [ "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION", "METAPHOR", "APOCALYPTIC_SYMBOL" ], "modules": [ "APOCALYPTIC" ], "aliases": [], "legacy_present": true, "legacy_raw_wording_public": false, "senses": [ { "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001215", "label": "Biblical prostitute/whore language can refer to literal sexual immorality and prostitution; that ordinary moral sense must remain distinct from prophetic covenant metaphors.", "classification": "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION", "definition": "Biblical prostitute/whore language can refer to literal sexual immorality and prostitution; that ordinary moral sense must remain distinct from prophetic covenant metaphors.", "not_always": "Literal prostitution is not itself a symbolic code.", "scope_note": "The headword has an ordinary sexual/moral referent as well as later metaphorical uses.", "claims": [ { "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001215", "statement": "Biblical prostitute/whore language can refer to literal sexual immorality and prostitution; that ordinary moral sense must remain distinct from prophetic covenant metaphors.", "asserted_classifications": [ "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION" ], "type_kinds": [], "evidence_grade": 1, "grade_basis": "G1_EXPLICIT_BIBLICAL_INTERPRETATION", "status": "REQUIRES_RECLASSIFICATION", "public_wording_class": "CATEGORY_OR_RECLASSIFICATION_NOTICE", "scope_limitation": "The headword has an ordinary sexual/moral referent as well as later metaphorical uses.", "strongest_alternative_explanation": null, "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.", "theological_intersections": [ "OTHER" ], "scripture_references": [ { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001865", "osis_start": "Josh.2.1", "osis_end": "Josh.2.1", "display_label": "Joshua 2:1", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" }, { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001866", "osis_start": "Prov.23.27", "osis_end": "Prov.23.27", "display_label": "Proverbs 23:27", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" } ], "source_citations": [ { "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001", "author_editor": null, "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison", "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1", "locator": null, "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED", "source_function": [ "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY", "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT" ], "locator_targets": [] } ], "s8_wording_provenance": null } ] }, { "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001216", "label": "The prophets explicitly use whoredom/prostitution language for covenant unfaithfulness and idolatrous abandonment of the LORD; Hosea 1:2 itself explains the land’s whoredom as f…", "classification": "METAPHOR", "definition": "The prophets explicitly use whoredom/prostitution language for covenant unfaithfulness and idolatrous abandonment of the LORD; Hosea 1:2 itself explains the land’s whoredom as forsaking the LORD, making the spiritual-idolatry association established in those covenant contexts.", "not_always": "The prophetic metaphor addresses covenant infidelity in specified texts and does not redefine every occurrence of sexual immorality as idolatry.", "scope_note": "Spiritual harlotry is an explicit covenant metaphor where the prophets establish it.", "claims": [ { "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001216", "statement": "The prophets explicitly use whoredom/prostitution language for covenant unfaithfulness and idolatrous abandonment of the LORD; Hosea 1:2 itself explains the land’s whoredom as forsaking the LORD, making the spiritual-idolatry association established in those covenant contexts.", "asserted_classifications": [ "METAPHOR", "IMAGE" ], "type_kinds": [], "evidence_grade": 1, "grade_basis": "G1_EXPLICIT_BIBLICAL_INTERPRETATION", "status": "ESTABLISHED", "public_wording_class": "SCRIPTURE_EXPLICITLY_IDENTIFIES", "scope_limitation": "Spiritual harlotry is an explicit covenant metaphor where the prophets establish it.", "strongest_alternative_explanation": null, "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.", "theological_intersections": [ "COVENANT", "HAMARTIOLOGY" ], "scripture_references": [ { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001867", "osis_start": "Hos.1.2", "osis_end": "Hos.1.2", "display_label": "Hosea 1:2", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" }, { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001868", "osis_start": "Ezek.16.15", "osis_end": "Ezek.16.34", "display_label": "Ezekiel 16:15–34", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" } ], "source_citations": [ { "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001", "author_editor": null, "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison", "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1", "locator": null, "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED", "source_function": [ "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY", "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT" ], "locator_targets": [] } ], "s8_wording_provenance": null } ] }, { "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001217", "label": "Revelation 17 uses prostitute and sexual-immorality imagery for Babylon’s corrupt alliance with kings and nations and explicitly identifies the woman as the great city; however …", "classification": "APOCALYPTIC_SYMBOL", "definition": "Revelation 17 uses prostitute and sexual-immorality imagery for Babylon’s corrupt alliance with kings and nations and explicitly identifies the woman as the great city; however Scripture does not assign “false doctrines” as the lexical meaning of whoredom, so that legacy extension must be demonstrated independently rather than built into the symbol.", "not_always": "Babylon’s corrupt practices, idolatry, luxury, violence, and alliances must be read from Revelation’s own description rather than compressed into “whoredom = false doctrine.”", "scope_note": "The apocalyptic prostitution image is controlled by Revelation 17–18; a general false-doctrine definition is not inspired interpretation.", "claims": [ { "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001217", "statement": "Revelation 17 uses prostitute and sexual-immorality imagery for Babylon’s corrupt alliance with kings and nations and explicitly identifies the woman as the great city; however Scripture does not assign “false doctrines” as the lexical meaning of whoredom, so that legacy extension must be demonstrated independently rather than built into the symbol.", "asserted_classifications": [ "APOCALYPTIC_SYMBOL", "METAPHOR" ], "type_kinds": [], "evidence_grade": 7, "grade_basis": "G7_INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE", "status": "INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE", "public_wording_class": "INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE", "scope_limitation": "The apocalyptic prostitution image is controlled by Revelation 17–18; a general false-doctrine definition is not inspired interpretation.", "strongest_alternative_explanation": null, "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.", "theological_intersections": [ "ESCHATOLOGY" ], "scripture_references": [ { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001869", "osis_start": "Rev.17.1", "osis_end": "Rev.17.6", "display_label": "Revelation 17:1–6", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" }, { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001870", "osis_start": "Rev.17.18", "osis_end": "Rev.17.18", "display_label": "Revelation 17:18", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" } ], "source_citations": [ { "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001", "author_editor": null, "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison", "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1", "locator": null, "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED", "source_function": [ "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY", "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT" ], "locator_targets": [] } ], "s8_wording_provenance": null } ] } ], "lexeme_mappings": [], "canonical_relationships": [], "negative_guardrails": [] }