{ "entry_id": "TSP-ENT-000538", "slug": "unclean", "url_path": "/types-symbols/unclean/", "canonical_name": "Unclean", "entry_classifications": [ "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION", "METAPHOR", "MOTIF" ], "modules": [], "aliases": [], "legacy_present": true, "legacy_raw_wording_public": false, "senses": [ { "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001164", "label": "Levitical “unclean” language primarily marks ritual, dietary, bodily, or cultic impurity within the Mosaic holiness system; the category can concern animals, persons, conditions, a…", "classification": "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION", "definition": "Levitical “unclean” language primarily marks ritual, dietary, bodily, or cultic impurity within the Mosaic holiness system; the category can concern animals, persons, conditions, and objects and therefore must not be collapsed into a synonym for moral evil or demonic identity.", "not_always": "Not every occurrence of biblical uncleanness denotes personal moral guilt or demonic agency.", "scope_note": "Ritual uncleanness is a covenantal holiness category whose moral or spiritual implications depend on the particular passage.", "claims": [ { "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001164", "statement": "Levitical “unclean” language primarily marks ritual, dietary, bodily, or cultic impurity within the Mosaic holiness system; the category can concern animals, persons, conditions, and objects and therefore must not be collapsed into a synonym for moral evil or demonic identity.", "asserted_classifications": [ "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION", "MOTIF" ], "type_kinds": [], "evidence_grade": 4, "grade_basis": "G4_RECURRENT_CANONICAL_MOTIF_OR_STRONG_THEMATIC_PATTERN", "status": "STRONGLY_SUPPORTED", "public_wording_class": "STRONGLY_SUPPORTED_PATTERN", "scope_limitation": "Ritual uncleanness is a covenantal holiness category whose moral or spiritual implications depend on the particular passage.", "strongest_alternative_explanation": null, "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.", "theological_intersections": [ "COVENANT" ], "scripture_references": [ { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001783", "osis_start": "Lev.11.1", "osis_end": "Lev.11.47", "display_label": "Leviticus 11", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" }, { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001784", "osis_start": "Lev.15.1", "osis_end": "Lev.15.33", "display_label": "Leviticus 15", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" } ], "source_citations": [ { "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001", "author_editor": null, "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison", "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1", "locator": null, "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED", "source_function": [ "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY", "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT" ], "locator_targets": [] } ], "s8_wording_provenance": null } ] }, { "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001165", "label": "The New Testament recurrently uses “unclean spirit” as a designation for demonic beings, so demonic uncleanness is a genuine lexical-contextual use when the noun “spirit” supplies …", "classification": "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION", "definition": "The New Testament recurrently uses “unclean spirit” as a designation for demonic beings, so demonic uncleanness is a genuine lexical-contextual use when the noun “spirit” supplies that referent.", "not_always": "Unclean can modify demonic spirits in explicit contexts but also applies to many non-demonic ritual categories.", "scope_note": "The demonic referent belongs to the full expression “unclean spirit,” not to the adjective “unclean” as an invariant code.", "claims": [ { "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001165", "statement": "The New Testament recurrently uses “unclean spirit” as a designation for demonic beings, so demonic uncleanness is a genuine lexical-contextual use when the noun “spirit” supplies that referent.", "asserted_classifications": [ "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION" ], "type_kinds": [], "evidence_grade": 4, "grade_basis": "G4_RECURRENT_CANONICAL_MOTIF_OR_STRONG_THEMATIC_PATTERN", "status": "STRONGLY_SUPPORTED", "public_wording_class": "STRONGLY_SUPPORTED_PATTERN", "scope_limitation": "The demonic referent belongs to the full expression “unclean spirit,” not to the adjective “unclean” as an invariant code.", "strongest_alternative_explanation": null, "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.", "theological_intersections": [ "OTHER" ], "scripture_references": [ { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001785", "osis_start": "Mark.1.23", "osis_end": "Mark.1.27", "display_label": "Mark 1:23–27", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" }, { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001786", "osis_start": "Mark.5.2", "osis_end": "Mark.5.13", "display_label": "Mark 5:2–13", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" } ], "source_citations": [ { "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001", "author_editor": null, "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison", "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1", "locator": null, "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED", "source_function": [ "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY", "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT" ], "locator_targets": [] } ], "s8_wording_provenance": null } ] }, { "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001166", "label": "Scripture does not establish the bare category “unclean” as a fixed symbol meaning “abominable” or “demonic”; Revelation 18:2 can place unclean spirits and unclean birds side by si…", "classification": "SYMBOL", "definition": "Scripture does not establish the bare category “unclean” as a fixed symbol meaning “abominable” or “demonic”; Revelation 18:2 can place unclean spirits and unclean birds side by side as distinct categories, and Mosaic uncleanness frequently concerns ritual status rather than demonism.", "not_always": "The inherited wording is too broad; specific contexts must determine whether uncleanness is ritual, moral, dietary, bodily, or demonic.", "scope_note": "The inherited wording is too broad; specific contexts must determine whether uncleanness is ritual, moral, dietary, bodily, or demonic.", "claims": [ { "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001166", "statement": "Scripture does not establish the bare category “unclean” as a fixed symbol meaning “abominable” or “demonic”; Revelation 18:2 can place unclean spirits and unclean birds side by side as distinct categories, and Mosaic uncleanness frequently concerns ritual status rather than demonism.", "asserted_classifications": [ "SYMBOL" ], "type_kinds": [], "evidence_grade": 7, "grade_basis": "G7_INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE", "status": "INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE", "public_wording_class": "INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE", "scope_limitation": "The inherited wording is too broad; specific contexts must determine whether uncleanness is ritual, moral, dietary, bodily, or demonic.", "strongest_alternative_explanation": null, "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.", "theological_intersections": [ "OTHER" ], "scripture_references": [ { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001787", "osis_start": "Rev.18.2", "osis_end": "Rev.18.2", "display_label": "Revelation 18:2", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" }, { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001788", "osis_start": "Lev.11.13", "osis_end": "Lev.11.19", "display_label": "Leviticus 11:13–19", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" } ], "source_citations": [ { "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001", "author_editor": null, "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison", "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1", "locator": null, "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED", "source_function": [ "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY", "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT" ], "locator_targets": [] } ], "s8_wording_provenance": null } ] } ], "lexeme_mappings": [], "canonical_relationships": [], "negative_guardrails": [] }