{
  "entry_id": "TSP-ENT-000537",
  "slug": "uncircumcision",
  "url_path": "/types-symbols/uncircumcision/",
  "canonical_name": "Uncircumcision",
  "entry_classifications": [
    "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION",
    "METAPHOR",
    "COVENANT_SIGN"
  ],
  "modules": [
    "COVENANT_SIGNS"
  ],
  "aliases": [
    {
      "alias_text": "UNCIRCUNCISION",
      "alias_type": "LEGACY_SPELLING"
    }
  ],
  "legacy_present": true,
  "legacy_raw_wording_public": false,
  "senses": [
    {
      "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001161",
      "label": "Genesis 17 explicitly requires circumcision as the sign of the Abrahamic covenant and states that an uncircumcised male who refuses that covenant sign is to be cut off from his people for breaking the",
      "classification": "COVENANT_SIGN",
      "definition": "Genesis 17 explicitly requires circumcision as the sign of the Abrahamic covenant and states that an uncircumcised male who refuses that covenant sign is to be cut off from his people for breaking the covenant; in that historical covenant administration, physical uncircumcision can therefore mark failure to bear the required covenant sign.",
      "not_always": "Scripture also uses uncircumcision for Gentile identity and metaphorical heart/ear/lip conditions.",
      "scope_note": "This claim concerns the Abrahamic circumcision command for males in Genesis 17 and must not be transferred unchanged to New Covenant standing in Christ.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001161",
          "statement": "Genesis 17 explicitly requires circumcision as the sign of the Abrahamic covenant and states that an uncircumcised male who refuses that covenant sign is to be cut off from his people for breaking the covenant; in that historical covenant administration, physical uncircumcision can therefore mark failure to bear the required covenant sign.",
          "asserted_classifications": [
            "COVENANT_SIGN"
          ],
          "type_kinds": [],
          "evidence_grade": 1,
          "grade_basis": "G1_EXPLICIT_BIBLICAL_INTERPRETATION",
          "status": "ESTABLISHED",
          "public_wording_class": "SCRIPTURE_EXPLICITLY_IDENTIFIES",
          "scope_limitation": "This claim concerns the Abrahamic circumcision command for males in Genesis 17 and must not be transferred unchanged to New Covenant standing in Christ.",
          "strongest_alternative_explanation": null,
          "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.",
          "theological_intersections": [
            "COVENANT",
            "ISRAELOLOGY"
          ],
          "scripture_references": [
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001775",
              "osis_start": "Gen.17.10",
              "osis_end": "Gen.17.14",
              "display_label": "Genesis 17:10–14",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            }
          ],
          "source_citations": [
            {
              "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001",
              "author_editor": null,
              "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison",
              "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1",
              "locator": null,
              "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED",
              "source_function": [
                "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY",
                "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT"
              ],
              "locator_targets": []
            }
          ],
          "s8_wording_provenance": null
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001162",
      "label": "In the New Testament “uncircumcision” recurrently functions as a Jewish designation or metonym for Gentiles; Ephesians 2:11–12 recalls Gentiles’ former alienation from Israel’s covenantal privileges, ",
      "classification": "METAPHOR",
      "definition": "In the New Testament “uncircumcision” recurrently functions as a Jewish designation or metonym for Gentiles; Ephesians 2:11–12 recalls Gentiles’ former alienation from Israel’s covenantal privileges, but this ethnic/covenantal usage should not be collapsed into a universal equation “uncircumcision = uncleanness.”",
      "not_always": "Physical uncircumcision and moral uncleanness are not identical categories.",
      "scope_note": "The term can denote physical status or Gentile identity; moral impurity must be established from the passage rather than assumed from the label.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001162",
          "statement": "In the New Testament “uncircumcision” recurrently functions as a Jewish designation or metonym for Gentiles; Ephesians 2:11–12 recalls Gentiles’ former alienation from Israel’s covenantal privileges, but this ethnic/covenantal usage should not be collapsed into a universal equation “uncircumcision = uncleanness.”",
          "asserted_classifications": [
            "METAPHOR"
          ],
          "type_kinds": [],
          "evidence_grade": 4,
          "grade_basis": "G4_RECURRENT_CANONICAL_MOTIF_OR_STRONG_THEMATIC_PATTERN",
          "status": "STRONGLY_SUPPORTED",
          "public_wording_class": "STRONGLY_SUPPORTED_PATTERN",
          "scope_limitation": "The term can denote physical status or Gentile identity; moral impurity must be established from the passage rather than assumed from the label.",
          "strongest_alternative_explanation": null,
          "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.",
          "theological_intersections": [
            "COVENANT",
            "ISRAELOLOGY",
            "ECCLESIOLOGY"
          ],
          "scripture_references": [
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001776",
              "osis_start": "Rom.2.26",
              "osis_end": "Rom.2.29",
              "display_label": "Romans 2:26–29",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001777",
              "osis_start": "Rom.3.30",
              "osis_end": "Rom.3.30",
              "display_label": "Romans 3:30",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001778",
              "osis_start": "Eph.2.11",
              "osis_end": "Eph.2.12",
              "display_label": "Ephesians 2:11–12",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            }
          ],
          "source_citations": [
            {
              "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001",
              "author_editor": null,
              "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison",
              "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1",
              "locator": null,
              "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED",
              "source_function": [
                "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY",
                "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT"
              ],
              "locator_targets": []
            }
          ],
          "s8_wording_provenance": null
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001163",
      "label": "First Corinthians 7:19, Galatians 5:6 and 6:15, and Colossians 3:11 explicitly deny that physical circumcision or uncircumcision determines what counts before God in Christ; therefore the legacy claim",
      "classification": "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION",
      "definition": "First Corinthians 7:19, Galatians 5:6 and 6:15, and Colossians 3:11 explicitly deny that physical circumcision or uncircumcision determines what counts before God in Christ; therefore the legacy claim “uncircumcision = out of covenantal relationship with God and his people” cannot be carried forward as a New Covenant rule.",
      "not_always": "Physical uncircumcision does not by itself define a person’s saving standing under the New Covenant.",
      "scope_note": "The New Testament preserves Israel’s historical circumcision covenant while explicitly refusing physical circumcision/uncircumcision as the basis of standing in Christ.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001163",
          "statement": "First Corinthians 7:19, Galatians 5:6 and 6:15, and Colossians 3:11 explicitly deny that physical circumcision or uncircumcision determines what counts before God in Christ; therefore the legacy claim “uncircumcision = out of covenantal relationship with God and his people” cannot be carried forward as a New Covenant rule.",
          "asserted_classifications": [
            "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION"
          ],
          "type_kinds": [],
          "evidence_grade": 1,
          "grade_basis": "G1_EXPLICIT_BIBLICAL_INTERPRETATION",
          "status": "ESTABLISHED",
          "public_wording_class": "SCRIPTURE_EXPLICITLY_IDENTIFIES",
          "scope_limitation": "The New Testament preserves Israel’s historical circumcision covenant while explicitly refusing physical circumcision/uncircumcision as the basis of standing in Christ.",
          "strongest_alternative_explanation": null,
          "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.",
          "theological_intersections": [
            "COVENANT",
            "SOTERIOLOGY",
            "ECCLESIOLOGY",
            "ISRAELOLOGY"
          ],
          "scripture_references": [
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001779",
              "osis_start": "1Cor.7.19",
              "osis_end": "1Cor.7.19",
              "display_label": "1 Corinthians 7:19",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001780",
              "osis_start": "Gal.5.6",
              "osis_end": "Gal.5.6",
              "display_label": "Galatians 5:6",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001781",
              "osis_start": "Gal.6.15",
              "osis_end": "Gal.6.15",
              "display_label": "Galatians 6:15",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001782",
              "osis_start": "Col.3.11",
              "osis_end": "Col.3.11",
              "display_label": "Colossians 3:11",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            }
          ],
          "source_citations": [
            {
              "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001",
              "author_editor": null,
              "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison",
              "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1",
              "locator": null,
              "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED",
              "source_function": [
                "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY",
                "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT"
              ],
              "locator_targets": []
            }
          ],
          "s8_wording_provenance": null
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "lexeme_mappings": [],
  "canonical_relationships": [],
  "negative_guardrails": []
}