{
  "entry_id": "TSP-ENT-000305",
  "slug": "joshua",
  "url_path": "/types-symbols/joshua/",
  "canonical_name": "Joshua",
  "entry_classifications": [
    "REPRESENTATIVE_PERSON",
    "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION",
    "TYPE"
  ],
  "modules": [
    "CHRISTOLOGICAL_TYPES",
    "NARRATIVE_PATTERNS"
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "legacy_present": true,
  "legacy_raw_wording_public": false,
  "senses": [
    {
      "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-000714",
      "label": "Joshua as historical leader into Canaan inheritance",
      "classification": "REPRESENTATIVE_PERSON",
      "definition": "Joshua is the historical covenant leader under whom Israel receives the promised land/rest in Canaan; “leader into inheritance” is historical-canonical description before typological inference.",
      "not_always": "Historical leadership into Canaan is not itself proof that Joshua is a formal person-type of Jesus.",
      "scope_note": "Historical leadership into Canaan is not itself proof that Joshua is a formal person-type of Jesus.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-000714",
          "statement": "The legacy “leader into inheritance” component is substantially historical: Joshua leads Israel into the promised land and the book reports the LORD giving Israel rest, so this should be established as narrative history before Christological typology is proposed.",
          "asserted_classifications": [
            "REPRESENTATIVE_PERSON",
            "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION"
          ],
          "type_kinds": [],
          "evidence_grade": 4,
          "grade_basis": "G4_RECURRENT_CANONICAL_MOTIF_OR_STRONG_THEMATIC_PATTERN",
          "status": "REQUIRES_RECLASSIFICATION",
          "public_wording_class": "CATEGORY_OR_RECLASSIFICATION_NOTICE",
          "scope_limitation": "Historical leadership into Canaan is not itself proof that Joshua is a formal person-type of Jesus.",
          "strongest_alternative_explanation": null,
          "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.",
          "theological_intersections": [
            "COVENANT",
            "ISRAELOLOGY"
          ],
          "scripture_references": [
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001089",
              "osis_start": "Josh.21.43",
              "osis_end": "Josh.21.45",
              "display_label": "Joshua 21:43–45",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            }
          ],
          "source_citations": [
            {
              "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001",
              "author_editor": null,
              "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison",
              "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1",
              "locator": null,
              "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED",
              "source_function": [
                "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY",
                "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT"
              ],
              "locator_targets": []
            }
          ],
          "s8_wording_provenance": null
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-000715",
      "label": "No explicit formal Joshua-to-Jesus “Captain” type",
      "classification": "TYPE",
      "definition": "Hebrews explicitly relates Joshua to the rest theme by contrast/escalation, but Scripture does not identify Joshua himself as a formal type of Jesus the Captain/author of salvation.",
      "not_always": "The rest/inheritance pattern may be stated strongly; the person-type claim must remain qualified as unestablished.",
      "scope_note": "The rest/inheritance pattern may be stated strongly; the person-type claim must remain qualified as unestablished.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-000715",
          "statement": "Joshua participates in a real rest/inheritance pattern that Hebrews explicitly surpasses, but Scripture does not formally identify Joshua as a type of Jesus “as Captain”; shared leadership themes or English glosses cannot supply the missing canonical designation.",
          "asserted_classifications": [
            "TYPE"
          ],
          "type_kinds": [
            "PERSON_TYPE",
            "POSITIVE_TYPE"
          ],
          "evidence_grade": 7,
          "grade_basis": "G7_INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE",
          "status": "INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE",
          "public_wording_class": "INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE",
          "scope_limitation": "The rest/inheritance pattern may be stated strongly; the person-type claim must remain qualified as unestablished.",
          "strongest_alternative_explanation": "A divinely governed rest/inheritance pattern with later escalation explains the canonical relation without asserting formal Joshua-to-Christ person typology.",
          "residual_uncertainty": "Strong canonical patterning is established; formal person-type status remains unestablished.",
          "theological_intersections": [
            "CHRISTOLOGY",
            "SOTERIOLOGY"
          ],
          "scripture_references": [
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001089",
              "osis_start": "Josh.21.43",
              "osis_end": "Josh.21.45",
              "display_label": "Joshua 21:43–45",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001090",
              "osis_start": "Heb.4.8",
              "osis_end": "Heb.4.11",
              "display_label": "Hebrews 4:8–11",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            },
            {
              "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-000570",
              "osis_start": "Heb.2.10",
              "osis_end": null,
              "display_label": "Hebrews 2:10",
              "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD"
            }
          ],
          "source_citations": [
            {
              "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001",
              "author_editor": null,
              "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison",
              "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1",
              "locator": null,
              "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED",
              "source_function": [
                "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY",
                "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT"
              ],
              "locator_targets": []
            }
          ],
          "s8_wording_provenance": null
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "lexeme_mappings": [],
  "canonical_relationships": [
    {
      "canonical_relationship_id": "TSP-S6-R03-P03-REL-0013",
      "title": "Joshua/Canaan Rest — incomplete rest surpassed in Hebrews",
      "canonical_statement": "Joshua gave a real land-rest horizon, but Hebrews argues that this was not God's final promised rest. The valid canonical relation is an incomplete-rest / salvation-history contrast that points beyond Joshua's achievement.",
      "canonical_action": "RECLASSIFY_FROM_PERSON_TYPE_TO_REST_PATTERN_CONTRAST",
      "guardrails": [
        "Do not identify Joshua as a formal personal type of Jesus 'as Captain' without explicit canonical designation.",
        "Retain the multi-source rest argument involving creation, wilderness failure, Joshua/Canaan, Psalm 95, and remaining Sabbath-rest."
      ],
      "relationship_status": "RECLASSIFIED"
    }
  ],
  "negative_guardrails": [
    {
      "guardrail_id": "TSP-S6-R03-P03-GRD-023",
      "canonical_relation_status": "NEGATIVE_GUARDRAIL_INSUFFICIENT",
      "adjudication_outcome": "INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE",
      "decision_statement": "No positive canonical type/symbol relationship is promoted beyond the source evidence: Joshua participates in a real rest/inheritance pattern that Hebrews explicitly surpasses, but Scripture does not formally identify Joshua as a type of Jesus “as Captain”; shared leadership themes or English glosses cannot supply the missing canonical designation."
    }
  ]
}