{ "entry_id": "TSP-ENT-000536", "slug": "2", "url_path": "/types-symbols/2/", "canonical_name": "2", "entry_classifications": [ "ORDINARY_DESCRIPTION", "MOTIF", "SYMBOL" ], "modules": [ "NUMBERS_CHRONOLOGY" ], "aliases": [], "legacy_present": true, "legacy_raw_wording_public": false, "senses": [ { "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001159", "label": "Deuteronomy 19:15 establishes the evidentiary rule that a matter is confirmed by two or three witnesses, and the same rule is reused in Matthew 18:16, 2 Corinthians 13:1, and 1 Timothy 5:19; the legac", "classification": "MOTIF", "definition": "Deuteronomy 19:15 establishes the evidentiary rule that a matter is confirmed by two or three witnesses, and the same rule is reused in Matthew 18:16, 2 Corinthians 13:1, and 1 Timothy 5:19; the legacy witness/testimony association is therefore strongly grounded as a recurring legal and ecclesial pattern, not as a free-standing numeral cipher.", "not_always": "Two also appears in many unrelated counts, pairings, measurements, and narrative details.", "scope_note": "The evidentiary rule concerns sufficient witnesses in specified judicial/ecclesial contexts; it does not assign testimony as the meaning of every occurrence of two.", "claims": [ { "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001159", "statement": "Deuteronomy 19:15 establishes the evidentiary rule that a matter is confirmed by two or three witnesses, and the same rule is reused in Matthew 18:16, 2 Corinthians 13:1, and 1 Timothy 5:19; the legacy witness/testimony association is therefore strongly grounded as a recurring legal and ecclesial pattern, not as a free-standing numeral cipher.", "asserted_classifications": [ "MOTIF" ], "type_kinds": [], "evidence_grade": 4, "grade_basis": "G4_RECURRENT_CANONICAL_MOTIF_OR_STRONG_THEMATIC_PATTERN", "status": "STRONGLY_SUPPORTED", "public_wording_class": "STRONGLY_SUPPORTED_PATTERN", "scope_limitation": "The evidentiary rule concerns sufficient witnesses in specified judicial/ecclesial contexts; it does not assign testimony as the meaning of every occurrence of two.", "strongest_alternative_explanation": null, "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.", "theological_intersections": [ "ECCLESIOLOGY", "OTHER" ], "scripture_references": [ { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001769", "osis_start": "Deut.19.15", "osis_end": "Deut.19.15", "display_label": "Deuteronomy 19:15", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" }, { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001770", "osis_start": "Matt.18.16", "osis_end": "Matt.18.16", "display_label": "Matthew 18:16", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" }, { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001771", "osis_start": "2Cor.13.1", "osis_end": "2Cor.13.1", "display_label": "2 Corinthians 13:1", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" }, { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001772", "osis_start": "1Tim.5.19", "osis_end": "1Tim.5.19", "display_label": "1 Timothy 5:19", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" } ], "source_citations": [ { "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001", "author_editor": null, "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison", "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1", "locator": null, "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED", "source_function": [ "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY", "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT" ], "locator_targets": [] } ], "s8_wording_provenance": null } ] }, { "sense_id": "TSP-SNS-001160", "label": "No biblical passage interprets the number two as an invariant symbol of “division” or “separation.” Scripture can describe two people or groups being separated in particular texts, but the separation ", "classification": "SYMBOL", "definition": "No biblical passage interprets the number two as an invariant symbol of “division” or “separation.” Scripture can describe two people or groups being separated in particular texts, but the separation comes from the event or statement, not from a divinely assigned meaning of the numeral itself.", "not_always": "Pairs and twos serve many ordinary narrative, legal, and practical functions.", "scope_note": "Specific two-person contrasts or separations remain valid in their own contexts without creating a general two = division rule.", "claims": [ { "claim_id": "TSP-CLM-001160", "statement": "No biblical passage interprets the number two as an invariant symbol of “division” or “separation.” Scripture can describe two people or groups being separated in particular texts, but the separation comes from the event or statement, not from a divinely assigned meaning of the numeral itself.", "asserted_classifications": [ "SYMBOL" ], "type_kinds": [], "evidence_grade": 7, "grade_basis": "G7_INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE", "status": "INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE", "public_wording_class": "INSUFFICIENT_BIBLICAL_EVIDENCE", "scope_limitation": "Specific two-person contrasts or separations remain valid in their own contexts without creating a general two = division rule.", "strongest_alternative_explanation": "The proposed division/separation symbolism appears to abstract a numerical code from passages where two parties happen to be contrasted or separated.", "residual_uncertainty": "No material residual uncertainty beyond the stated scope limitation.", "theological_intersections": [ "OTHER" ], "scripture_references": [ { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001773", "osis_start": "Mark.6.7", "osis_end": "Mark.6.7", "display_label": "Mark 6:7", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" }, { "passage_ref_id": "TSP-PAS-001774", "osis_start": "Matt.24.40", "osis_end": "Matt.24.41", "display_label": "Matthew 24:40–41", "versification_system": "ENGLISH_STANDARD" } ], "source_citations": [ { "source_id": "TSP-SRC-000001", "author_editor": null, "title": "Canonical Scripture: MT/LXX/NA28 with NET/ESV comparison", "publication_data": "Text loci verified for TSP-S0F Batch 1", "locator": null, "verification_level": "V4_QUOTATION_VERIFIED", "source_function": [ "CANONICAL_AUTHORITY", "TEXT_ESTABLISHMENT" ], "locator_targets": [] } ], "s8_wording_provenance": null } ] } ], "lexeme_mappings": [], "canonical_relationships": [], "negative_guardrails": [] }