Commentary Companion Dictionary Selective-depth dictionary for the AI Bible Commentary website
Canonical dictionary entry

Problem of Evil

The problem of evil asks how evil and suffering relate to the goodness, wisdom, and power of God. In theological use, the topic should be defined from...

PracticeTier 2

At a glance

Definition: The problem of evil asks how evil and suffering relate to the goodness, wisdom, and power of God.

  • Let the defining passages show Problem of Evil as The problem of evil asks how evil and suffering relate to the goodness, wisdom, and power of God.
  • Trace how Problem of Evil serves the gathered life, holiness, order, and witness of Christ's people.
  • Avoid reducing Problem of Evil to institutional habit or denominational slogan; keep it governed by the passages that establish it.

Simple explanation

The problem of evil asks how evil and suffering relate to the goodness, wisdom, and power of God.

Academic explanation

The problem of evil asks how evil and suffering relate to the goodness, wisdom, and power of God. In dictionary use, the term should be explained from its immediate contexts, its place in biblical theology, and its bearing on faithful Christian life.

Extended academic explanation

The problem of evil asks how evil and suffering relate to the goodness, wisdom, and power of God. More fully, the topic should be interpreted through the passages that name it, illustrate it, regulate it, or warn about its misuse. A sound treatment therefore asks how Problem of Evil relates to creation, sin, redemption, discipleship, and the church's life under Christ, without turning a practical category into a slogan detached from context.

Biblical context

Biblically, Problem of Evil appears in lament, wisdom, psalms, prophetic hope, the sufferings of Christ, and apostolic teaching as problem of evil asks how evil exists in a world ruled by a good and powerful God. The canonical witness therefore holds the problem of evil together with honest grief, divine sovereignty, faithful endurance, and resurrection hope rather than with despair or denial.

Historical context

Historically, discussion of Problem of Evil moved between exegesis, worship, preaching, pastoral care, and doctrinal reflection, so its treatment changed with the needs of different eras and communities. Patristic writers, medieval theologians, Reformation pastors, and modern interpreters used the term to connect biblical language with lived belief rather than to isolate it within a single technical dispute.

Jewish and ancient context

In ancient Jewish context, the problem of evil would be heard against the worlds of lament psalms, Job, exile, martyr hope, apocalyptic expectation, and prayers for deliverance. Early Christians then interpreted such realities through the sufferings and resurrection of Christ, learning to hold grief, discipline, waiting, and hope together.

Key texts

  • Gen. 3:1-19
  • Hab. 1:2-4
  • Rom. 8:18-25

Secondary texts

  • Job 1:20-22
  • Ps. 73:1-17
  • Rev. 21:3-4

Theological significance

Theological reflection on Problem of Evil is important because it refers to how evil and suffering relate to the goodness, wisdom, and power of God, locating the term within the church's confession about God, Christ, judgment, salvation, and the last things.

Philosophical explanation

Problem of Evil has conceptual importance because it asks how suffering, hiddenness, agency, and hope can be held together without sentimentality or fatalism. The main pressure points are hiddenness, creaturely finitude, moral response, and the distinction between explanation, consolation, and pastoral care. Strong accounts refuse both reductive naturalism and undisciplined spiritualization.

Interpretive cautions

Do not handle Problem of Evil as a vague label, ministry slogan, or proof-text shortcut detached from its textual setting. Distinguish descriptive language from metaphysical extension, and keep revealed claims about creation, providence, and creaturely life from being turned into philosophical absolutes the text does not state. Use the entry carefully enough to prevent it from carrying more doctrinal weight than the text assigns, while still allowing later theological reflection to summarize real biblical patterns.

Major views note

In conservative usage, Problem of Evil is usually treated as a meaningful biblical and theological category, but traditions differ over how tightly it should be defined and how directly it should govern doctrine, worship, or pastoral practice. The main points of disagreement concern creaturely freedom, providence, the purpose of suffering, mystery and explanation, and how lament should accompany theological precision.

Doctrinal boundaries

Problem of Evil must be handled within the biblical grammar of providence, lament, judgment, hope, and creaturely finitude rather than by fatalism or easy pastoral formulas. It should neither explain evil away nor turn mystery into silence, but keep lament, prayer, repentance, and hope within the horizon of God's rule. It should leave space for lament and creaturely pain rather than demanding premature closure. Properly handled, Problem of Evil sets pastoral and doctrinal limits that keep suffering from being interpreted either without God or without wisdom.

Practical significance

Pastorally, Problem of Evil matters because believers need wise, Scripture-shaped guidance for everyday obedience, worship, suffering, relationships, stewardship, and life together in the church.