Commentary Companion Dictionary Selective-depth dictionary for the AI Bible Commentary website
Canonical dictionary entry

covetousness

Covetousness is sinful craving for what God has not given and a form of idolatrous desire. In theological use, the topic should be defined from the...

PracticeTier 2

At a glance

Definition: Covetousness is sinful craving for what God has not given and a form of idolatrous desire.

  • Read covetousness through the passages that describe it as sinful craving for what God has not given and a form of idolatrous desire.
  • Notice how covetousness belongs to the church's worship, fellowship, discipline, and public confession.
  • Avoid reducing covetousness to institutional habit or denominational slogan; keep it governed by the passages that establish it.

Simple explanation

Covetousness is sinful craving for what God has not given and a form of idolatrous desire.

Academic explanation

Covetousness is sinful craving for what God has not given and a form of idolatrous desire. In dictionary use, the term should be explained from its immediate contexts, its place in biblical theology, and its bearing on faithful Christian life.

Extended academic explanation

Covetousness is sinful craving for what God has not given and a form of idolatrous desire. More fully, the topic should be interpreted through the passages that name it, illustrate it, regulate it, or warn about its misuse. A sound treatment therefore asks how covetousness relates to creation, sin, redemption, discipleship, and the church's life under Christ, without turning a practical category into a slogan detached from context.

Biblical context

Biblically, covetousness is addressed in the law, prophets, wisdom literature, the teaching of Jesus, and apostolic ethics as sinful craving for what God has not given and a form of idolatrous desire. Scripture ties covetousness to justice, mercy, stewardship, public responsibility, and love of neighbor under God's rule rather than to mere technique, profit, or partisan instinct.

Historical context

Historically, discussion of covetousness was driven first by exegesis of biblical texts and then by the need to integrate those texts within larger doctrinal synthesis. The category therefore passed through preaching, commentary, controversy, and confessional summary, accumulating meaning across centuries rather than from one isolated moment.

Jewish and ancient context

In ancient Jewish and Greco-Roman context, covetousness was heard amid land laws, patronage, poverty, debt, public authority, labor arrangements, and obligations to the poor and stranger. That setting explains both the sharpness of biblical warnings and the positive calls to justice, mercy, and stewardship.

Key texts

  • Exod. 20:17
  • Luke 12:15
  • Col. 3:5

Secondary texts

  • Mic. 2:1-2
  • Heb. 13:5
  • Eph. 5:3-5

Theological significance

Within biblical theology, covetousness matters because it refers to sinful craving for what God has not given and a form of idolatrous desire, showing how Scripture uses the term to shape the church's confession, hope, and theological judgment.

Philosophical explanation

At the conceptual level, Covetousness presses theology to explain how divine transcendence and intelligibility can be described in creaturely language. The key issues are essence and relation, analogy and univocity, necessity and contingency, and the disciplined use of metaphysical language in service of doctrine. Its philosophical value lies in stabilizing doctrinal speech while refusing to let abstract system-building outrun Scripture.

Interpretive cautions

Do not handle covetousness as a vague label, ministry slogan, or proof-text shortcut detached from its textual setting. Distinguish inward disposition, moral obligation, covenant setting, and pastoral application, rather than importing therapeutic, political, or cultural meanings that the text itself is not trying to supply. Define the entry with enough discipline that it clarifies rather than blurs the relation between exegesis, doctrine, and pastoral use, especially where traditions extend the language in different directions.

Major views note

Covetousness is usually treated as normatively addressed in Scripture, but traditions differ over how its moral claims should be specified, casuistically applied, and pastorally administered. The main points of disagreement concern justice and mercy, stewardship and prudence, and where moral obligation ends and policy judgment begins.

Doctrinal boundaries

Covetousness should be governed by God's self-revelation, preserving transcendence, intelligibility, and reverence without making creaturely categories the measure of deity. It must resist both speculative overreach and empty agnosticism, using analogical language in service of confession, worship, and obedient reasoning. It should let analogical and apophatic disciplines clarify speech about God without canceling the reality of divine self-disclosure. Properly handled, covetousness stabilizes God-talk as a ministerial grammar for theology rather than a speculative system detached from Scripture.

Practical significance

Pastorally, covetousness matters because believers need wise, Scripture-shaped guidance for everyday obedience, worship, suffering, relationships, stewardship, and life together in the church.